Written By : Terry Turner
Edited By : Kim Borwick
This page features 37 Cited Research Articles

Consumernotice.org adheres to the highest ethical standards for content production and distribution. All content is thoroughly researched and verified at each stage of the publication process.

Our writers and editors follow strict guidelines for written and visual content, including vetting all sources and verifying quotes and statistics, to guarantee honesty and integrity in our reporting.

We collaborate with legal and medical experts and consumer safety professionals to further ensure the accuracy of our content.

JUUL accounts for roughly seven in every 10 e-cigarettes sold in the United States. The device resembles a USB stick and uses pods of e-liquid to create an inhalable vapor. Its manufacturer says each pod contains about the same amount of nicotine as a pack of 20 tobacco cigarettes. At least one lawsuit claims the pods “deliver more highly addictive nicotine into the bloodstream at a faster rate than cigarettes.”

Multiple people have filed individual lawsuits claiming use of the products led to nicotine addiction. There are several class action lawsuits underway, too. As of March 2019, one class action in California included more than 30 people from around United States ranging from 14-year-olds to adults.

In addition to JUUL Labs, lawsuits name Big Tobacco giant Altria and its subsidiary, Philip Morris. The companies bought a 35 percent stake in the e-cigarette maker in December 2018.

As of July 15, 2021, 2,339 lawsuits are pending in California federal court.

In addition to lawsuits filed by individuals, several states filed lawsuits against JUUL Labs for business practices that contributed to a youth vaping epidemic. In June 2021, the company agreed to pay $40 million to North Carolina in the first of state settlements. At least nine other states have filed lawsuits and 39 other states are investigating the company, according to CNBC.

three icons representing filing a lawsuit
Experiencing nicotine addiction or seizures after using JUUL or another e-cigarette?
Get your free case review today.

Lawsuits Claim New or Worsened Nicotine Addiction

People who have filed JUUL lawsuits claim the device led to nicotine addiction or worsened their addiction when they used it to try to stop smoking. Many of the lawsuits have been filed by parents on behalf of their teenage children who used the products and later became addicted.

The lawsuits also claim that the e-cigarette’s maker engaged in deceptive marketing that hid information about nicotine content and targeted teens through social networks. Some cite a specific need for expensive addiction treatment because of the e-cigarettes.

People Who Have Sued JUUL Labs
Carl Cooper
Cooper filed his lawsuit in a California state court. His lawsuit claims he started smoking tobacco in 2010 when he was 15. Cooper said in the complaint that he was a weekend smoker who tried the e-cigarette as a way to stop smoking. Instead, it worsened his nicotine addiction in just a couple of weeks. “Whereas Cooper had never felt the need to smoke on a daily basis, he now finds that he feels compelled to vape JUUL pods every day,” his complaint said.
Erin and Jared NesSmith of Sarasota, Florida, filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of their teenage daughter identified in court documents as A.N. Their complaint claims A.N. is addicted to JUUL and suffers from seizures as a result of nicotine ingestion. The lawsuit claims the manufacturer deliberately targeted teens by mimicking Big Tobacco’s past marketing practices. It also claims that the e-cigarette is designed to replicate the feel of a tobacco cigarette, making it easier for its users to switch to conventional cigarettes.
J.M.-1 and J.M.-2
Sabrina Zampa filed a federal lawsuit in Miami on behalf of her minor sons identified as J.M-1 and J.M.-2. The lawsuit says both boys started using the company’s e-cigarette and pods in middle school and by the age of 14 and 16, both were addicted to nicotine as a result. It claims the boys were “intrigued with JUUL’s products because of the branding and more particularly the flavors.” The lawsuit says both teens have tried to break their nicotine habit but have been unable to because of headaches and other side effects of nicotine withdrawal.
Elizabeth Swearingen and John Peavy
The two Alabama college students filed a class action lawsuit in that state, claiming JUUL’s flavored vape liquids led to their nicotine addiction and other health problems. Swearingen is a former cross-country runner who now has trouble breathing during simple tasks, according to the complaint. The complaint also claims Peavy developed chest congestion and loss of appetite due to using the products.

Many of the lawsuits so far have been class actions attempting to consolidate all lawsuits within a state. JUUL Labs has sought to move some of these into a Northern California federal court near where the company is headquartered.

The number of lawsuits filed since the beginning of 2019 has increased steadily. Legal experts believe that a large volume of the suits could lead to a single, national mass litigation.

Studies Found JUUL Labs Marketed to Teens, Downplayed Nicotine

JUUL hit the market in 2015 and saw explosive growth following an aggressive social media marketing effort. The Washington Post reported the company’s revenues grew sevenfold in 2018 alone.

United States Surgeon General Jerome Adams said in 2018 that the problem of students vaping had become an epidemic in America. Lawsuits have cited studies of the manufacturer’s marketing practices, which appeared to be aimed at teens.

“JUUL’s advertising imagery in its first six months on the market was patently youth oriented,” Stanford University School of Medicine researchers wrote in a 2019 paper.

The study by Stanford Research into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising also found the manufacturer had sought out high-profile social media influencers and paid them for positive reviews while insisting they not disclose the relationship.

"JUUL’s advertising imagery in its first six months on the market was patently youth oriented."

A 2018 study in the British Medical Journal found that the manufacturer had effectively used social media to quickly gain the lion’s share of the e-cigarette market in the United States. The marketing strategy differed from previous e-cigarette advertising campaigns that used television or promotions that reached older consumers.

“We found the number of JUUL-related tweets was highly correlated with quarterly retail sales of JUUL,” the authors wrote.

The researchers also found slick marketing campaigns on Instagram in which images of the e-cig products were associated with “lifestyle feelings such as relaxation, freedom and sex appeal.”

A 2017 study in PloS One found that the pods may have contained 20 percent more nicotine than their maker had advertised.

The manufacturer did not add a nicotine warning to its Twitter feed until October 2017. Many of its early promotional emails from April 2015 through April 2016 also failed to make any mention of nicotine content.

In November 2018, JUUL Labs shut down its Facebook and Instagram accounts. It has also changed how it uses Twitter and YouTube. Company CEO Kevin Burns said in a statement that the company was making changes to counteract use of its products among teens.

States and Public Health Groups File Lawsuits

State attorneys general in North Carolina and Massachusetts have taken aim at some of the same marketing complaints named in JUUL lawsuits. And public health groups have filed lawsuits to have the e-cig maker pay for treatment of nicotine addicted teens.

North Carolina Sues Over E-Cigarette Marketing to Minors

North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein filed the first state consumer lawsuit against JUUL Labs in May 2019, claiming the company marketed products to minors and mislead consumers about risks.

"JUUL's business practices are not only reckless, they're illegal. And I intend to put a stop to them. We cannot allow another generation of young people to become addicted to nicotine."

The lawsuit says the company “played a central role in fostering the epidemic of e-cigarette use” among teens.

“JUUL’s business practices are not only reckless, they’re illegal. And I intend to put a stop to them. We cannot allow another generation of young people to become addicted to nicotine,” Stein said in a statement announcing the lawsuit.

The lawsuit followed an investigation the attorney general had launched into the company’s marketing practices in October 2018.

Massachusetts Launches Investigation into Marketing Practices

In July 2018, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Healey announced her office was investigating JUUL’s marketing and sales to minors. At the same time, she sent out cease and desist letters to two retailers selling the devices and other e-cig products online until they could set up a more secure age verification system.

“I am investigating JUUL and online sellers of their products to keep these highly addictive products out of the hands of children,” Healy said in a statement.

In May 2019, Healey announced a consumer lawsuit stemming from the investigation. The suit said Eonsmoke LLC failed for years to verify the ages of online customers buying the trendy devices and other e-cigarette products. The company was one of those that received a cease and desist order the previous year.

Public Health Advocates Demand Payment for Addiction Treatment

Public health advocates at a Boston-based university announced plans to file a class action lawsuit against JUUL Labs in April 2019 unless the company paid for a statewide prevention and treatment program for teens with nicotine addiction due to its products.

The lawsuit by the Public Health Advocacy Institute at Northeastern University is believed to be one of the first of its kind against the manufacturer, according to The Boston Globe.

The institute sent a letter to the company accusing it of making and selling products designed to be addictive and appealing to minors. The letter also asks JUUL Labs to fund treatment and prevention programs along with research into teen e-cig addiction. The letter said if the manufacturer agreed to fund the programs within 30 days, it would hold off on filing the lawsuit.

Federal Judge Orders FDA to Speed Up E-Cigarette Review

In May 2019, a federal judge sided with several public health advocates in ordering the Food and Drug Administration to speed up its review of all brands of electronic cigarettes.

“As it turns out, even addiction has become electronic,” Judge Paul Grimm wrote in his opinion.

Six public health groups along with several individual doctors filed the lawsuit in 2018, claiming the lack of FDA oversight was allowing underage vaping to grow unchecked.

Public Health Groups That Sued the FDA
  • American Academy of Pediatrics (National & Maryland chapters)
  • American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network
  • American Heart Association
  • American Lung Association
  • Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids
  • Truth Initiative

The agency has had the authority to regulate e-cigarettes since 2016 but had been slow to enforce regulations on the industry. The FDA had not planned to even begin reviewing e-cigarette products until 2021. The court decision could force the agency to begin much sooner unless it is overturned on appeal.

three icons representing filing a lawsuit
Experiencing serious complications from vaping?
Find out if you qualify for compensation.

Compensation for Health Costs, Addiction Treatment and Smoking Prevention

JUUL lawsuits are still in the very early stages. There have been no trials and no publicly disclosed settlements yet. But several experts have compared the legal actions against the e-cig maker to the tobacco lawsuits and settlements of the 1990s and early 2000s. In each situation, individuals, public health advocates and state attorneys general filed lawsuits.

With the tobacco litigation, individuals filed successful lawsuits, claiming tobacco led to addiction and health problems. The lawsuits were aided by the fact that industry documents showed that tobacco companies knew their cigarettes were addictive.

In February 1999, a California jury awarded a $51.5 million verdict to a smoker with inoperable lung cancer. Juries continued to award large verdicts to smokers in the years since. RJ Reynolds reported 53 verdicts against it totaling more than $375 million over a three-year period.

State attorneys general also sued tobacco companies over costs of nicotine addiction and health costs to states. Tobacco companies agreed to a $246 billion settlement with 46 states in 1998. The money would be paid out to help with smoking prevention and treatment plans for 25 years.

Please seek the advice of a qualified professional before making decisions about your health or finances.
Last Modified: September 21, 2021

37 Cited Research Articles

Consumernotice.org adheres to the highest ethical standards for content production and references only credible sources of information, including government reports, interviews with experts, highly regarded nonprofit organizations, peer-reviewed journals, court records and academic organizations. You can learn more about our dedication to relevance, accuracy and transparency by reading our editorial policy.

  1. Blythe, A. (2019, May 20). As N.C Attorney Genera Tries to Slow JUUL Use Among N.C. Teens, Researchers Weight Health Effects of E-Cigarettes. North Carolina Health News. Retrieved from https://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/2019/05/20/as-nc-attorney-general-tries-to-stop-juul-use-among-nc-teens-researchers-weigh-health-effects-of-e-cigarettes/
  2. Bogusky, A. (2019, May 3). How Big Tobacco Got a New Generation Hooked. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/03/opinion/vaping-juul.html
  3. Burns, K. (2018, November 2018). JUUL Labs Action Plan; Message From Kevin Burns, CEO, JUUL Labs. JUUL Labs. Retrieved from https://www.juullabs.com/juul-labs-action-plan/
  4. Chaykowski, K. (2018, November 16). The Disturbing Focus of JUUL’s Early Marketing Campaigns. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/kathleenchaykowski/2018/11/16/the-disturbing-focus-of-juuls-early-marketing-campaigns/#7de1cab314f9
  5. Cole, S. (2018, November 13). JUUL Shut Down Its Facebook and Instagram. Vice. Retrieved from https://www.vice.com/en/article/439v8q/juul-shutting-down-facebook-instagram-teen-vaping
  6. Dickson, E.J. (2019, May 6). JUUL Faces Class-Action Lawsuit for Allegedly Marketing Vapes to Teens. Rolling Stone. Retrieved from https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/juul-faces-class-action-lawsuit-for-allegedly-marketing-vapes-to-teens-831675/
  7. Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Florida. (2018, November 30). Zampa et al. v. JUUL Labs Inc. et al.; Complaint and demand for Jury Trial. Case No.: 18-37507CA01. Truth in Advertising. Retrieved from https://www.truthinadvertising.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Zampa-v-Juul-Labs-complaint.pdf
  8. Glantz, S.A. (2019, April 16). Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against JUUL and Altria/Philip Morris Builds on Past Litigation Against Big Tobacco. UCSF Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. Retrieved from https://tobacco.ucsf.edu/class-action-lawsuit-filed-against-juul-and-altriaphilip-morris-builds-past-litigation-against-big-tobacco
  9. Ho, C. (2019, April 21). Mounting Lawsuits Against JUUL Reminiscent of Early Tobacco Litigation. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved from https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Mounting-lawsuits-against-Juul-reminiscent-of-13783089.php
  10. Hoffman, J. (2018, November 16). The Price of Cool: A Teenager, a JUUL and Nicotine Addiction. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/16/health/vaping-juul-teens-addiction-nicotine.html
  11. Huang, J. et al. (2018, May 31). Vaping Versus JUULing: How the Extraordinary Growth and Marketing of JUUL Transformed the U.S. Retail E-cigarette Market. British Medical Journal. https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/28/2/146
  12. Jackler, R.K. et al. (2019, January 31). JUUL Advertising Over Its First Three Years on the Market. Stanford Research Into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising. Retrieved from https://tobacco-img.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21231836/JUUL_Marketing_Stanford.pdf
  13. Kaplan, S. (2019, May 27). Scientists Wanted: Recruited by JUUL, Many Researchers Say No. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/27/health/juul-ecigarettes-science.html
  14. Kempe, Y. (2019, April 29). Lawsuit Against JUUL Demands Funding of Statewide Treatment and Research Programs. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/04/29/lawsuit-against-juul-demands-funding-statewide-treatment-and-research-programs/wvhP2AJzYSmhgrnATS6XKK/story.html
  15. Kounang, N. and Nedelman, M. (2019, May 15). North Carolina Sues JUUL, Claiming Deceptive Marketing and Targeting Youth. CNN. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/15/health/north-carolina-juul-lawsuit-bn/index.html
  16. Lepiarz, J. (2019, April 30). Northeastern Public Health Institute Sues JUUL Over Marketing Nicotine to Minors. WBUR. Retrieved from https://www.wbur.org/news/2019/04/30/northeastern-public-health-institute-lawsuit-juul-ecigarette-minors-nicotine
  17. Lucas, A. (2021, June 18). Juul agrees to $40 million settlement in North Carolina teen marketing lawsuit. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/28/north-carolina-wins-40-million-settlement-in-juul-lawsuit.html
  18. McDonald, D. (2019, May 30). In Battle Against Vaping, AG Sues National Retailer, Alleging It Targets Underage Consumers. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/05/29/battle-against-vaping-sues-national-retailer-alleging-targets-underage-consumers/5suyj0GiSZX7u0EZT4RYPJ/story.html
  19. Meier, B. (1999, February 11). $51 Million Verdict Awarded to Smoker Is Biggest of Its Kind. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/1999/02/11/us/51-million-verdict-awarded-to-smoker-is-biggest-of-its-kind.html
  20. NPR. (2013, October 13). 15 Years Later, Where Did All the Cigarette Money Go? All Things Considered. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2013/10/13/233449505/15-years-later-where-did-all-the-cigarette-money-go
  21. Office of North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein. (2019, May 15). Attorney General Josh Stein Takes E-cigarette Maker JUUL to Court. News Release. Retrieved from https://ncdoj.gov/attorney-general-josh-stein-takes-e-cigarette-make/
  22. Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General. (2018, July 24). AG Healey Announces Investigation into JUUL, Other Online E-Cigarette Retailers Over Marketing and Sale to Minors. Mass.gov Press Release. Retrieved from https://www.mass.gov/news/ag-healey-announces-investigation-into-juul-other-online-e-cigarette-retailers-over-marketing
  23. Pankow, J.F. et al. (2017, March 8). Benzene Formation in Electronic Cigarettes. PloS One. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173055
  24. Paul, D. (2018, July 30). E-cigarette Maker JUUL Targeted Teens With False Claims of Safety, Lawsuit Says. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/07/30/e-cigarette-maker-juul-targeted-teens-with-false-claims-of-safety-lawsuit-claims/?utm_term=.5e32778af41a
  25. Perrone, M. (2019, May 15). Anti-vaping Victory? Federal Judge Orders FDA to Speed Up Review of E-cigarettes. Associated Press/USA Today. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/05/15/food-and-drug-administration-ordered-speed-up-e-cigarettes-review/3687106002/
  26. Rainer, A. (2019, April 29). Letter to Kevin Burns, President and CEO of JUUL Labs, Inc. The Public Health Advocacy Institute. Retrieved from https://www.phaionline.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Juul-93A-pub.pdf
  27. Reynolds American Inc. (2016, February 11). Form 10-K; Reynolds American Inc. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Annual Reports. Retrieved from http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/r/NYSE_rai_2015.pdf
  28. Rodriquez, N. (2019, May 6). Sarasota Family Sues JUUL and Tobacco Giants. Herald-Tribune. Retrieved from https://www.heraldtribune.com/news/20190506/sarasota-family-sues-juul-and-tobacco-giants
  29. Superior Court of Durham County, N.C. (2019, May 15). Introduction and Summary. Retrieved from https://media.cbs17.com/nxs-wncntv-media-us-east-1/document_dev/2019/05/15/NC-v-Juul-Summary_1557944598948_87673213_ver1.0.pdf
  30. Taylor, S. (2019, May 29). Students in Alabama Join Class Action Lawsuit Against E-Cigarette Makers. Tuscaloosa News. Retrieved from https://www.tuscaloosanews.com/news/20190529/students-in-alabama-file-class-action-lawsuit-against-e-cigarette-makers
  31. Tiku, N. (2018, July 23). Users Sue JUUL for Addicting Them to Nicotine. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/users-sue-juul-for-addicting-them-to-nicotine/
  32. U.S. District Court, District of Maryland. (2019, May 15). American Academy of Pediatrics et al. vs. Food and Drug Administration et al.; Memorandum Opinion. Case No.: PWG-18-883. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Retrieved from https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/assets/content/press_office/2019/2019_05_15_court_ruling.pdf
  33. U.S. District Court, Middle Dist. of Florida. (2019, April 15). NesSmith et al. vs. JUUL Labs Inc. et al.; Class Action Complaint. UCSF Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. Retrieved from https://tobacco.ucsf.edu/sites/g/files/tkssra4661/f/wysiwyg/Juul%20lawsuit%20-%20Florida%20April%202019.pdf
  34. U.S. District Court, Northern Dist. of California. (2019, January 25). In re: JUUL Labs Inc. Product Litigation; Consolidated Amended Class Action and Complaint; Case No. 3:18-cv-2499. Retrieved from https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/doc1/035117600169
  35. U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. (2018, April 2018). Colgate et al. v. JUUL Labs Inc. et al.: Class Action Complaint; Case No. 3:18-cv-2499. Retrieved from https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_multidocs.pl?caseid=325882&arr_de_seq_nums=5&magic_num=&pdf_header=&hdr=&pdf_toggle_possible=1&caseid=325882&zipit=&magic_num=&arr_de_seq_nums=5&got_warning=&create_roa=&create_appendix=&bates_format=&dkt=&got_receipt=1
  36. U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida. (2018, October 10). J.Y. and Barbara Yannucci v. JUUL Labs, Inc.; Class Action Complaint. Case No.: 1:18cv24186. Retrieved from https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_multidocs.pl?caseid=334534&arr_de_seq_nums=4&magic_num=&pdf_header=&hdr=&pdf_toggle_possible=1&caseid=334534&zipit=&magic_num=&arr_de_seq_nums=4&got_warning=&create_roa=&create_appendix=&bates_format=&dkt=&got_receipt=1
  37. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2021, July 15). MDL Statistics Report - Distribution of Pending MDL Dockets by District. Retrieved from https://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/Pending_MDL_Dockets_By_District-July-15-2021.pdf