Edited By : Renée Deveney
This page features 18 Cited Research Articles
Fact Checked
Fact-Checked

Editors carefully fact-check all Consumer Notice, LLC content for accuracy and quality.

Consumer Notice, LLC has a stringent fact-checking process. It starts with our strict sourcing guidelines.

We only gather information from credible sources. This includes peer-reviewed medical journals, reputable media outlets, government reports, court records and interviews with qualified experts.

Heavy Metals Baby Food Lawsuit Eligibility Checklist

We created a checklist for lawsuits over heavy metals in baby food to help you determine your eligibility. This checklist includes brands of baby food and health conditions your child may have developed.

You may be eligible to file a lawsuit if your child:
  • Ate a brand of baby food that tested high for heavy metals, including Beech-Nut, Earth's Best Organic, Gerber, HappyBaby, Happy Family Organics, Parent’s Choice, Plum Organics or Sprout Organic.
  • Received a diagnosis of autism or ADHD after exposure to toxic metals in baby food.

The unique deadline for filing a lawsuit in your state, known as the statute of limitations, might also affect your eligibility. Some of these deadlines could be as little as one year. A lawyer will be able to tell you about this deadline.

Even if you don’t think you’re eligible, it can be worthwhile to speak with an attorney. Only they can tell you if you qualify, and you don’t lose anything by talking to them.

How To File a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit

The first step in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit is finding an experienced product liability lawyer. We understand that filing a toxic baby food lawsuit can feel overwhelming and emotionally draining, especially for a family with young children who may have suffered injuries from baby food they thought was safe.

Consumer Notice can help make filing an autism or ADHD baby food lawsuit as easy and stress-free as possible. All you have to do is sign up for a free case review and let our experienced legal partners evaluate your case. There’s no pressure, just answers about your options.

Your legal team will be with you each step of the way by:
  • Asking you how you were affected by toxic baby food in a free case review.
  • Gathering evidence about your case, such as medical records, proof you bought the baby food (receipts) and expert opinions on how heavy metals increase the risk of autism or ADHD.
  • Filing your toxic baby food lawsuit.
  • Negotiating a toxic baby food lawsuit settlement or preparing your case for trial and representing you in court.
three icons representing filing a lawsuit
Concerned about autism or ADHD after baby food?
Get a Free Case Review

Your lawyer will litigate your case with compassion, and you don’t have to pay anything unless they win your case.

Baby Food Autism Lawsuit Compensation

Compensation for baby food autism lawsuits can include awards for physical, financial and mental injuries. This covers past, present and future damages.

Compensation you might receive from a toxic baby food lawsuit may cover:
  • Pain, suffering and lost earnings
  • Special education and lifelong care
  • Therapy and medical bills

Because children with autism or ADHD may require lifelong treatment, compensation could include financial assistance for all aspects of their care. Heavy metal exposure may also lead to antisocial behavior, lower earning potential and a greater risk of criminal activity.

Why Parents Are Filing Heavy-Metal Baby Food Lawsuits

Parents are filing heavy-metal baby food lawsuits because a government investigation found that several brands of baby food contained unsafe levels of arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury. This led to concerns about food safety for young children.

Baby food testing found metal levels that were up to:
  • 5 times the acceptable level for mercury
  • 69 times the acceptable level for cadmium
  • 91 times the acceptable level for arsenic
  • 177 times the acceptable level for lead

Studies in Frontiers in Pediatrics and Environmental Research have shown that children exposed to these heavy metals have a higher risk of developing autism or ADHD.

Lawsuits claim that baby food manufacturers knew they were selling products that exposed children to dangerous levels of heavy metals, yet they didn’t warn consumers. Furthermore, defendants failed to uphold child safety and protect children from toxic metals. Instead, they exposed them to the risk of autism, ADHD and other health issues.

Brands Named in Heavy Metals Baby Food Lawsuits

The government investigation found dangerous levels of heavy metals in specific baby food brands, including Gerber and Walmart’s Parent’s Choice.

Brands included in toxic baby food lawsuits:
  • Beech-Nut, sold by Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
  • Earth’s Best Organic, sold by Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
  • Gerber, sold by Gerber Products Company
  • HappyBaby and Happy Family Organics, sold by Nurture, Inc.
  • Parent’s Choice, sold by Walmart
  • Plum Organics, sold by Campbell Soup Company
  • Sprout Organic, sold by Sprout Foods, Inc.

Though Nestlé, Danone and Hero A.G. weren’t mentioned in the government investigation, they have been included as defendants in the Master Complaint.

Baby Food Multidistrict Litigation Timeline

In April 2024, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated toxic baby food lawsuits into multidistrict litigation (MDL 3101) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. MDLs are large groups of cases with common facts that the panel combines into a single litigation for discovery and pretrial proceedings to make the process more efficient.

So far, the litigation is in the early stages, and no bellwether test trials have been scheduled. As of August 2025, defendants have been trying to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Master Complaint. We’ll report back once discovery has begun and the court has set the trial dates.

FAQs About Toxic Baby Food Lawsuits

How many people have filed toxic baby food lawsuits?
As of July 2025, there are 180 toxic baby food lawsuits in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Does baby food cause autism and ADHD?
No. Baby food itself doesn’t cause autism or ADHD. However, exposure to high levels of heavy metals in certain brands of baby food may increase the risk of children developing autism and ADHD.
Have there been any baby food recalls for heavy metals?
Yes, there have been recalls for heavy metals in baby food. In June 2021, Beech-Nut Nutrition recalled its Beech-Nut baby food due to an unacceptable level of arsenic. In March 2025, Fruselva issued a recall for its Good & Gather Baby Pea, Zucchini, Kale & Thyme Vegetable Puree due to elevated lead levels. In May 2025, Publix recalled its GreenWise Pear, Kiwi, Spinach & Pea Baby Food because of the potential for lead contamination.
Which baby food companies are being sued?
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Campbell Soup Company, Danone, Gerber Products Company, Hain Celestial Group, Hero A.G., Nestlé, Nurture, Inc., Sprout Foods, Inc., & Walmart
How are toxic baby food lawsuit settlement amounts determined?
All cases are different, but factors that could determine the amount of a baby food settlement include the severity of a child’s injuries, the medical expenses they incurred, their need for future care and the amounts of any previous settlements or jury verdicts.
Please seek the advice of a qualified professional before making decisions about your health or finances.
Last Modified: December 17, 2025

18 Cited Research Articles

Consumernotice.org adheres to the highest ethical standards for content production and references only credible sources of information, including government reports, interviews with experts, highly regarded nonprofit organizations, peer-reviewed journals, court records and academic organizations. You can learn more about our dedication to relevance, accuracy and transparency by reading our editorial policy.

  1. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2025, July 1). MDL Statistics Report - Distribution of Pending MDL Dockets by District. Retrieved from https://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/Pending_MDL_Dockets_By_District-July-1-2025_0.pdf
  2. Khimm, S. (2025, May 16). Publix Recalls Baby Food Pouches Over Potential Lead Contamination. Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/health/recall/publix-recalls-baby-food-pouches-potential-lead-contamination-rcna207112
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2025, May 7). Enforcement Report. Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/ires/?Event=96501
  4. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2025, April 16). Heavy Metals in Baby Food. Retrieved from https://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/baby/feeding-nutrition/Pages/Metals-in-Baby-Food.aspx
  5. Kou, X. et al. (2025, February 15). Effects of Prenatal Exposure To Multiple Heavy Metals on Infant Neurodevelopment: A Multi-Statistical Approach. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026974912500020X
  6. LaMotte, S. (2025, January 7). Baby Food Labels Will Reveal Levels of Lead and Other Heavy Metals for First Time. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/04/health/baby-food-qr-codes-wellness/index.html
  7. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2025, January 6). Closer to Zero: Reducing Childhood Exposure to Contaminants from Foods. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/food/environmental-contaminants-food/closer-zero-reducing-childhood-exposure-contaminants-foods
  8. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. (2024, July 15). In Re: Baby Food Products Liability Litigation. Master Long-Form Complaint. Retrieved from https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/in-re-baby-food-products-liability-litigation-master-complaint-usdc-northern-california.pdf
  9. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2024, April 11). In Re: Baby Food Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation (NO. II). Transfer Order. Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-jpml-1_24-F-03101/pdf/USCOURTS-jpml-1_24-F-03101-0.pdf
  10. Heng, Y.Y. et al. (2022, March 31). Heavy Metals and Neurodevelopment of Children in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8970501/
  11. U.S. House of Representatives. (2021, September 29). New Disclosures Show Dangerous Levels of Toxic Heavy Metals in Even More Baby Foods. Retrieved from https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/democrats-oversight.house.gov/files/ECP%20Second%20Baby%20Food%20Report%209.29.21%20FINAL.pdf
  12. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2021, June 8). Beech-Nut Nutrition Company Issues a Voluntary Recall of One Lot of Beech-Nut Single Grain Rice Cereal and Also Decides to Exit the Rice Cereal Segment. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/beech-nut-nutrition-company-issues-voluntary-recall-one-lot-beech-nut-single-grain-rice-cereal-and
  13. U.S. House of Representatives. (2021, February 4). Baby Foods Are Tainted with Dangerous Levels of Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury. Retrieved from https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/democrats-oversight.house.gov/files/2021-02-04%20ECP%20Baby%20Food%20Staff%20Report.pdf
  14. Cornell Law School. (2020, June). Multidistrict Litigation. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/multidistrict_litigation
  15. Gorini, F. et al. (2014, June 27). The Role of Heavy Metal Pollution in Neurobehavioral Disorders: A Focus on Autism. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40489-014-0028-3
  16. Kim, S. et al. (2013, October). Lead, Mercury, and Cadmium Exposure and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935113001503
  17. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco. (n.d.). CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:24-md-03101-JSC. Retrieved from https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?115989372665538-L_1_0-1
  18. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco. (n.d.). In re: Baby Food Products Liability Litigation. Retrieved from https://cand.uscourts.gov/in-re-baby-food-products-liability-litigation/