Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million Over Sexual Assault Claims in Landmark Trial
Editors carefully fact-check all Consumer Notice, LLC content for accuracy and quality.
Consumer Notice, LLC has a stringent fact-checking process. It starts with our strict sourcing guidelines.
We only gather information from credible sources. This includes peer-reviewed medical journals, reputable media outlets, government reports, court records and interviews with qualified experts.
In a development that could impact thousands of other lawsuits, Uber has been ordered to pay $8.5 million to a woman who claimed she was sexually assaulted by one of the rideshare company’s drivers.
The verdict came at the end of a landmark trial — one of the first to go before a jury over claims that Uber has failed to keep its passengers safe from driver assaults.
There are currently about 3,200 Uber sexual assault lawsuits pending in federal court involving these claims, with others active in state court as well. Separate lawsuits have also been filed involving similar allegations against Lyft.
Why the Uber Sexual Assault Verdict Matters
The trial win is a massive boon for people who have filed lawsuits and a troubling development for Uber as it looks to combat growing litigation.
This case was the second Uber sexual assault lawsuit to go before a jury. The first trial, held in California state court, ended in a win for Uber in October 2025. In that case, the jury had determined that the company was negligent but not legally responsible for the alleged sexual assault of a passenger.
That early victory for Uber put more pressure on plaintiffs to notch a win in the first federal bellwether trial. Bellwethers serve as test cases when thousands of similar lawsuits are filed, giving both sides a chance to see how their arguments will hold up before a jury.
Wins in bellwether lawsuits can go a long way toward convincing a company to agree to a settlement for thousands of cases rather than risk taking more cases to trial.
With a victory now secured in that trial, and more bellwethers anticipated, additional losses for Uber could play a big role in potential settlement negotiations.
But while the win is a positive development for plaintiffs, it wasn’t a complete success. The jury ordered Uber to pay out $8.5 million in compensatory damages, but did not award any punitive damages and rejected other claims, like design defect. Compensatory damages are meant to reimburse the plaintiff for their harm or suffering, while punitive damages are designed to punish the defendant. The plaintiff had originally asked for more than $140 million in combined damages.
Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits Claim Company Failed to Protect Passengers
The Uber lawsuits claim that the rideshare company failed to protect passengers from sexual assaults by drivers and refused to implement safety measures that could have made a difference despite being aware of the potential problem.
“As early as 2014 Uber became aware that Uber drivers were physically and/or sexually assaulting and raping female passengers,” one lawsuit states. “In the nine years since, sexual predators driving for Uber have continued to sexually assault, harass, kidnap, physically assault, rape, and/or other attack Uber’s passengers.”
Lawsuits claim that Uber began charging passengers an extra $1 fee to promote passenger safety, but never put the money collected from hundreds of millions of rides toward improving safety.
People who have filed cases also claim that the company prioritized growth over safety measures, skipping security steps commonly used by taxi companies, such as fingerprinting or conducting background checks.
Thousands of these cases remain active in federal and state courts.
